I would prioritize irrigation and village roads first, because they address basic livelihoods and long-term productivity.
Public justification:
· Fairness & impact: Most residents directly need reliable water and roads for income and daily safety. A square benefits a smaller, urban-focused group.
· Economic logic: Better irrigation raises agricultural output and reduces poverty, which eventually generates tax revenue. Roads cut transport costs and improve market access.
· Social trust: Using limited funds on visible, high-maintenance prestige projects while basic needs go unfilled would break public trust.
· Compromise: I would propose a modest, phased version of the city square—e.g., a multi-purpose open space that also serves as a market or event ground—funded only after core infrastructure targets are met.
Public justification:
· Fairness & impact: Most residents directly need reliable water and roads for income and daily safety. A square benefits a smaller, urban-focused group.
· Economic logic: Better irrigation raises agricultural output and reduces poverty, which eventually generates tax revenue. Roads cut transport costs and improve market access.
· Social trust: Using limited funds on visible, high-maintenance prestige projects while basic needs go unfilled would break public trust.
· Compromise: I would propose a modest, phased version of the city square—e.g., a multi-purpose open space that also serves as a market or event ground—funded only after core infrastructure targets are met.